<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="publications60.xsl"?>

<bibtex:file xmlns:bibtex="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">
<!-- This file was exported from JabRef jabref.sf.net -->
<!-- 2006-01-17 added DOI XML character formatting, because DOI can contain &lt; and &gt; -->

<bibtex:entry id="1996d">
  <bibtex:article>
    <bibtex:author>C&#45;tin Cristescu and A.M. Preda and I. M. Popescu</bibtex:author>

    <bibtex:title>Influence of Laser Irradiation on the Morphology of Fractal Electrodeposition</bibtex:title>

    <bibtex:journal>Applied Surface Science</bibtex:journal>

    <bibtex:year>1996</bibtex:year>
    <bibtex:volume>101</bibtex:volume>


    <bibtex:pages>114-119</bibtex:pages>










    <bibtex:doi>10.1016/S0169&#45;4332(96)00447&#45;3</bibtex:doi>






    <bibtex:comment>2. Invited and Commissioned Publications</bibtex:comment>

    <bibtex:key>physics</bibtex:key>

  </bibtex:article>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2005a">
  <bibtex:incollection>
    <bibtex:author>Anna Alexandrova; Nancy Cartwright; Sophia Efstathiou; Andrew Hamilton</bibtex:author>
    <bibtex:editor>Frank Jackson and Michael Smith</bibtex:editor>
    <bibtex:title>Philosophy of Science: Laws</bibtex:title>
    <bibtex:booktitle>The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Analytic Philosophy</bibtex:booktitle>

    <bibtex:publisher>Oxford University Press</bibtex:publisher>
    <bibtex:year>2005</bibtex:year>



    <bibtex:pages>792-818</bibtex:pages>






    <bibtex:address>Oxford</bibtex:address>


    <bibtex:url>http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/60971838&#38;&#35;x0026;referer=brief&#95;results</bibtex:url>






    <bibtex:keywords>Philosophy of Science</bibtex:keywords>
    <bibtex:comment>2. Invited and Commissioned Publications</bibtex:comment>

    <bibtex:key>laws of nature</bibtex:key>

  </bibtex:incollection>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2004a">
  <bibtex:incollection>
    <bibtex:author>Marta Petreu and Mircea Flonta (I only revised and redacted this entry)</bibtex:author>
    <bibtex:editor>E. Craig</bibtex:editor>
    <bibtex:title>Philosophy in Romania</bibtex:title>
    <bibtex:booktitle>Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy</bibtex:booktitle>

    <bibtex:publisher>Routledge</bibtex:publisher>
    <bibtex:year>2004</bibtex:year>










    <bibtex:address>London</bibtex:address>


    <bibtex:url>http://www.rep.routledge.com/</bibtex:url>







    <bibtex:comment>2. Invited and Commissioned Publications</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:incollection>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2007a">
  <bibtex:inproceedings>
    <bibtex:author>Cory Wright</bibtex:author>
    <bibtex:editor>Hinman&#44; L.&#44; Brey&#44; P.&#44; Floridi&#44; L.&#44; Grodzinsky&#44; F. and Introna&#44; L.</bibtex:editor>
    <bibtex:title>Autonomous Agency&#44; AI&#44; and Allostasis: A Biomimetic Perspective (abriged version of the paper published in Pragmatics and Cognition)</bibtex:title>
    <bibtex:booktitle>WP 07&#45;05 Proceedings of CEPE 2007 : The 7th International Conference of Computer Ethics; Philosophical Enquiry</bibtex:booktitle>

    <bibtex:publisher>ITT</bibtex:publisher>
    <bibtex:year>2007</bibtex:year>





















    <bibtex:comment>2. Invited and Commissioned Publications</bibtex:comment>

    <bibtex:key>cognitive science</bibtex:key>

  </bibtex:inproceedings>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2007b">
  <bibtex:article>
    <bibtex:author>Cory Wright</bibtex:author>

    <bibtex:title>Autonomous Agency&#44; AI&#44; and Allostasis: A Biomimetic Perspective</bibtex:title>

    <bibtex:journal>Pragmatics and Cognition</bibtex:journal>

    <bibtex:year>2007</bibtex:year>
    <bibtex:volume>15</bibtex:volume>
    <bibtex:month>November</bibtex:month>

    <bibtex:pages>485-513</bibtex:pages>
    <bibtex:number>3</bibtex:number>







    <bibtex:abstract>We argue that the concepts of mechanism and autonomy appear to be antagonistic when autonomy is conflated with agency. Once these concepts are disentangled&#44; it becomes clearer how autonomy emerges from complex forms of control. Subsequently&#44; current biomimetic strategies tend to focus on homeostatic regulatory systems; we propose that research in AI and robotics would do well to incorporate biomimetic strategies that instead invoke models of allostatic mechanisms as a way of understanding how to enhance autonomy in artificial systems.</bibtex:abstract>
    <bibtex:url>http://www.benjamins.nl/cgi&#45;bin/t&#95;bookview.cgi&#63;bookid=P&#37;26C&#37;2015&#37;3A3</bibtex:url>







    <bibtex:comment>1. Refereed Publications</bibtex:comment>
    <bibtex:note>Special issue on &#39;Mechanicism and autonomy: what can robotics teach us about human cognition and action&#63;&#39;</bibtex:note>
    <bibtex:key>cognitive science</bibtex:key>

  </bibtex:article>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="1998c">
  <bibtex:inbook>


    <bibtex:title>Henry Chadwick &#34;Augustine&#34; (1986)</bibtex:title>


    <bibtex:publisher>Humanitas</bibtex:publisher>
    <bibtex:year>1998, 2006</bibtex:year>










    <bibtex:address>Bucharest</bibtex:address>


    <bibtex:url>http://humanitas.ro/carti/carte.php&#63;id=417</bibtex:url>







    <bibtex:comment>6. Translations&#44; Notes and Foreword (in Romanian)</bibtex:comment>
    <bibtex:note>Translation</bibtex:note>


  </bibtex:inbook>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="1996c">
  <bibtex:inbook>


    <bibtex:title>Jonathan Barnes: &#34;Aristotle&#34; (1982)</bibtex:title>


    <bibtex:publisher>Humanitas</bibtex:publisher>
    <bibtex:year>1996, 2006</bibtex:year>










    <bibtex:address>Bucharest</bibtex:address>


    <bibtex:url>http://humanitas.ro/carti/carte.php&#63;id=270</bibtex:url>







    <bibtex:comment>6. Translations&#44; Notes and Foreword (in Romanian)</bibtex:comment>
    <bibtex:note>Translation</bibtex:note>


  </bibtex:inbook>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="1995-2002bookreviews">
  <bibtex:article>


    <bibtex:title>I published in Romanian about ten reviews of philosophical books</bibtex:title>

    <bibtex:journal>Krisis&#44; Revue Roumaine de Philosophie&#44; etc.</bibtex:journal>

    <bibtex:year>1995-2002</bibtex:year>





















    <bibtex:comment>3. Book Reviews</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:article>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2009">
  <bibtex:article>


    <bibtex:title>Haluk Ogmen&#44; Bruno Breitmeyer: The First Half Second: The Microgenesis and Temporal Dynamics of Unconscious and Conscious Visual Processes (MIT Press&#44; 2006)</bibtex:title>

    <bibtex:journal>Philosophical Psychology</bibtex:journal>

    <bibtex:year>2009</bibtex:year>
    <bibtex:volume>21</bibtex:volume>
    <bibtex:month>Winter</bibtex:month>


    <bibtex:number>1(&#63;)</bibtex:number>








    <bibtex:url>http://mechanism.ucsd.edu/&#126;pp/current&#37;20issue.html</bibtex:url>







    <bibtex:comment>3. Book Reviews</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:article>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2008a">
  <bibtex:incollection>

    <bibtex:editor>Dennis Dieks</bibtex:editor>
    <bibtex:title>Mechanisms of Unification in Kaluza&#45;Klein theory</bibtex:title>
    <bibtex:booktitle>The Ontology of Spacetime&#44; II</bibtex:booktitle>

    <bibtex:publisher>Elsevier</bibtex:publisher>
    <bibtex:year>2008</bibtex:year>
    <bibtex:volume>4</bibtex:volume>


    <bibtex:pages>275-300</bibtex:pages>


    <bibtex:series>Philosophy and Foundations of Physics</bibtex:series>



    <bibtex:address>Amsterdam</bibtex:address>

    <bibtex:abstract>In this paper I discuss two attempts by Theodor Kaluza (1921) and by Oskar Klein (1926) to unify electromagnetism (EM) and general relativity (GR) within a five&#45;dimensional Riemannian manifold. I follow Kaluza&#45;Klein unification by comparing Kaluza&#39;s results to Klein&#39;s. Klein&#39;s theory gains explanatory power and unificatory strength on the one hand&#44; and on the other hand&#44; it uses fewer types of brute facts than Kaluza&#39;s. The specificity of Klein&#39;s theory is that it relies on an extrinsic element of unification&#44; i.e. the wavefunction behavior&#44; which is not intrinsic to EM or GR. Finally&#44; I discuss these two theories in the context of Tim Maudlin&#39;s (1996) ranking of unification and I clarify in what sense they constitute counterexamples to some of Margaret Morrison&#39;s recent (2000) assertions about unification.</bibtex:abstract>
    <bibtex:url>http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/bookdescription.cws&#95;home/714789/description&#35;toc</bibtex:url>
    <bibtex:doi>10.1016/S1871&#45;1774(08)00015&#45;6</bibtex:doi>





    <bibtex:keywords>Philosophy of Physics</bibtex:keywords>
    <bibtex:comment>1. Refereed Publications</bibtex:comment>

    <bibtex:key>unification&#44; physics</bibtex:key>

  </bibtex:incollection>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2008c">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>Dynamics and Emergence in the definition of living systems</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2008</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>March</bibtex:month>










    <bibtex:abstract>John Collier and Cliff Hooker attempted to explain life and intelligence as &#8220;complexly organized systems&#8221;. Their analysis is two dimensional: the systems are classified according to complexity and organization and living systems are complex systems&#44; self&#45;organized in which redundancy is global and of higher order. The question I ask in this paper is whether the dynamical explanation&#44; in particular the Collier&#38;&#35;x0026;Hooker dynamical explanation is intrinsically linked to emergence. I want to explore the strength of this connection in this context as well as in the general discussion about emergence and dynamics. I conclude that the dynamical explanation&#44; albeit powerful in itself&#44; can not grant emergentism.</bibtex:abstract>








    <bibtex:comment>8. Philosophy of Science</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2008d">
  <bibtex:incollection>

    <bibtex:editor>Adrian Nita</bibtex:editor>
    <bibtex:title>Identitatea &#238;n timp: c&#226;teva repere metafizice [Identity in Time and its Metaphysics]</bibtex:title>
    <bibtex:booktitle>Identitate si individuatie</bibtex:booktitle>

    <bibtex:publisher>Pelican</bibtex:publisher>
    <bibtex:year>2008</bibtex:year>










    <bibtex:address>Giurgiu&#44; Romania</bibtex:address>










    <bibtex:comment>5. Materials in Romanian (invited or commissioned)</bibtex:comment>


    <bibtex:nstandard name="file" type="pdf" description="">nita08identitatetimp.pdf</bibtex:nstandard>

  </bibtex:incollection>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2008e">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>Unificatory and approximately true theories: a case study</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2008</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>March</bibtex:month>










    <bibtex:abstract>Is an approximately true (albeit false) theory that unifies important for the general advancement of science&#63; I investigate the connection between unification as a theoretical virtue of a theory and its verisimilitude&#44; I argue for the relevance of unificatory theories which are approximately true and I address a couple of counterarguments by analyzing a case study: Kaluza&#45;Klein model used to unify general relativity with electromagnetism. I unveil some of its major theoretical virtue&#8212;unification in connection with its power of explanation&#44; parsimony&#44; simplification. I discuss in what sense Kaluza&#45;Klein is an approximately true theory. I end this paper by addressing some counterarguments against the relevance of the contemporary Kaluza&#45;Klein theory.</bibtex:abstract>








    <bibtex:comment>8. Philosophy of Science</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2007c">
  <bibtex:article>


    <bibtex:title>Leibniz and the Mathematization of Forces</bibtex:title>

    <bibtex:journal>Revue Roumaine de Philosophie</bibtex:journal>

    <bibtex:year>2007</bibtex:year>
    <bibtex:volume>51</bibtex:volume>


    <bibtex:pages>100-120</bibtex:pages>
    <bibtex:number>1&#45;2</bibtex:number>







    <bibtex:abstract>Firstly&#44; I revise the argument for the existence of primitive forces as found in some writings of Leibniz from the late 1680s (especially in Specimen Dynamicum) and his classification of forces in primitive and derivative after 1680. Secondly&#44; I raise a question concerning the representation of forces by mathematical equations in the calculus. I echo some of Leibniz&#8217;s worries about the power of mathematics to represent active forces. Mathematics as &#8216;calculus with infinitesimals&#8217; is not suitable to describe active forces. Leibniz anticipated other methods to deal with classification of active forces&#44; especially the algebraic methods based on meta&#45;properties of theories like symmetries and conservation. As a conclusion I present a reason to view active forces as non&#45;mathematical in the sense of not being describable by calculus&#44; but reasonable enough to be captured by an &#8220;analysis of ideas&#8221;. Leibniz actually did not reject the impossibility of any mathematics to represent his primitive forces&#44; but at least he would say that calculus (with infinitesimals) is not enough to represent the primitive forces. This will conciliate somehow mathematics per se and Leibniz&#8217;s metaphysics.</bibtex:abstract>
    <bibtex:url>http://ifilosofie.uv.ro/revue51.html</bibtex:url>






    <bibtex:keywords>published</bibtex:keywords>
    <bibtex:comment>2. Invited and Commissioned Publications</bibtex:comment>

    <bibtex:key>history of philosophy&#44; Leibniz</bibtex:key>
    <bibtex:nstandard name="file" type="pdf" description="">leibnizforces3.pdf</bibtex:nstandard>

  </bibtex:article>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2006a">
  <bibtex:incollection>

    <bibtex:editor>Adrian Nita</bibtex:editor>
    <bibtex:title>Este timpul reductibil la cauzalitate&#63; [On the Reduction of Time to Causation]</bibtex:title>
    <bibtex:booktitle>Natura timpului</bibtex:booktitle>

    <bibtex:publisher>Pelican</bibtex:publisher>
    <bibtex:year>2006</bibtex:year>



    <bibtex:pages>155-187</bibtex:pages>






    <bibtex:address>Giurgiu&#44; Romania</bibtex:address>










    <bibtex:comment>5. Materials in Romanian (invited or commissioned)</bibtex:comment>


    <bibtex:nstandard name="file" type="pdf" description="">nita06timpcauzalitate.pdf</bibtex:nstandard>

  </bibtex:incollection>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2005batterman">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>&#39;Third Theories&#39; and Batterman&#39;s Argument for Emergentism</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2005</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>March</bibtex:month>










    <bibtex:abstract>In this paper I discuss R. Batterman&#8217;s third theory approach to emergentism of scientific theories. I criticize his argument on three bases: there are too many third theories&#44; they face the multiple realizability problem as well as they are too dependent on empirical and observational data.</bibtex:abstract>








    <bibtex:comment>8. Philosophy of Science</bibtex:comment>


    <bibtex:nstandard name="file" type="pdf" description="battermanthird2.pdf">battermanthird2.pdf</bibtex:nstandard>

  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2005information">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>Information and the Asymmetry of Explanation</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2005</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>June</bibtex:month>



















    <bibtex:comment>8. Philosophy of Science</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2005plato">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>&#34;Natures&#34; in Meinwald&#39;s Reconstruction of Plato&#39;s Parmenides</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2005</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>April</bibtex:month>



















    <bibtex:comment>8. History of Philosophy</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2005structures">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>How to Apply Structures to the World: the Role of Logic in Structural Realism</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2005</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>December</bibtex:month>










    <bibtex:abstract>In this paper I intend to provide another argument against apriorism. I discuss firstly the connection between structural realism as a doctrine in philosophy of science and structuralism in mathematics and secondly I emphasize the role of&#10;logic in the economy of this connection. Logic is used in this case as an application scheme of mathematical structures to structures in the world. As a consequence&#44; the &#8216;revisability&#8217; of logic as well as its dependence on the world (advocated by Tarski and Quine among others) is restated.</bibtex:abstract>








    <bibtex:comment>8. Philosophy of Science</bibtex:comment>


    <bibtex:nstandard name="file" type="pdf" description="structuralismmath&#95;2.pdf">structuralismmath&#95;2.pdf</bibtex:nstandard>

  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2005vagueness">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>Relations among Vague Terms in Scientific Language</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2005</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>June</bibtex:month>



















    <bibtex:comment>8. Philosophy of Science</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2004b">
  <bibtex:article>


    <bibtex:title>The Primal Miracle and the Existence as Totality in Leibniz</bibtex:title>

    <bibtex:journal>Arches&#44; Revue Internationale des Sciences Humaines</bibtex:journal>

    <bibtex:year>2004</bibtex:year>
    <bibtex:volume>7</bibtex:volume>


    <bibtex:pages>53-61</bibtex:pages>








    <bibtex:abstract>Nous tentons d&#39;approcher la raison pour laquelle les miracles engagent&#44; chez Leibniz&#44; l&#39;existence dans sa totalit&#233;. On sait qu&#39;il veut adapter la doctrine chr&#233;tienne des miracles &#224; son syst&#232;me m&#233;taphysique. Pour ce faire&#44; Leibniz utilise trois voies: 1) le miracle comme transgression des lois de la nature&#44; con&#231;ues en tant qu&#39;instances de la Loi de l&#39;Univers (&#955;). Ici&#44; la difficult&#233; est de d&#233;montrer comment il est possible qu&#39;un &#233;v&#233;nement qui enfreint les instances particuli&#232;res de &#955; (lois de la nature) peut se soumettre aux &#955; elles&#45;m&#234;mes. 2) Un crit&#232;re &#233;pist&#233;mologique pour distinguer les miracles des &#233;v&#233;nements ordinaires&#44; fond&#233; sur les limitations de notre facult&#233; de comprendre les raisons sup&#233;rieures de Dieu. 3) Le mi racle &#34;primig&#232;ne&#34; de la Cr&#233;ation qui ne se r&#233;duit pas au langage de 1) ou 2) et qui est li&#233; &#224; la question fondamentale de la m&#233;taphysique: &#34;pourquoi donc y a&#45;t&#45;il quelque chose plut&#244;t que rien&#63;&#34; Les premi&#232;res explications se retrouvent dans plusieurs textes de Leibniz (et largement discut&#233;es dans l&#39;ex&#233;g&#232;se)&#44; alors que la troisi&#232;me est mentionn&#233;e bri&#232;vement dans quelques textes moins connus. Nous voulons d&#233;montre r que la troisi&#232;me est ind&#233;pendante d&#39;un langage des lois ou d&#39;un langage de l&#39;&#233;pist&#233;mologie et qu&#39;elle est premi&#232;rement ontologique. Nous consid&#233;rons cette troisi&#232;me explication comme fondamentale pour le syst&#232;me de Leibniz.</bibtex:abstract>
    <bibtex:url>http://www.arches.ro/revue/no07/arches07.htm</bibtex:url>






    <bibtex:keywords>History of philosophy&#44; Leibniz</bibtex:keywords>
    <bibtex:comment>2. Invited and Commissioned Publications</bibtex:comment>

    <bibtex:key>Leibniz</bibtex:key>

  </bibtex:article>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2004bohm1">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>Who&#39;s Who in the Bohmian World</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2004</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>July</bibtex:month>



















    <bibtex:comment>8. Philosophy of Physics</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2004bohm2">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>A Bohmian Answer to the Identity Crisis in Quantum Mechanics</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2004</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>October</bibtex:month>










    <bibtex:abstract>In this paper I take into consideration the advantages Bohmian mechanics has in dealing with the problem of identical particles in quantum mechanics. I discuss two recent paper of Goldstein et al. (2004) and I try to show that they have the resources to answer the issues of identity raised by philosophers (J. Butterfield and M. Redhead for example) in respect to&#10;quantum mechanics in general. Moreover&#44; Bohmian mechanics is able to provide interesting results in the statistics of quantum particles starting from some &#8220;metaphysical&#8221; postulates. I conclude that this interpretation scores better than standard interpretations of quantum mechanics in respect to the demands of a metaphysics of identity.</bibtex:abstract>








    <bibtex:comment>8. Philosophy of Physics</bibtex:comment>


    <bibtex:nstandard name="file" type="pdf" description="bohm2.pdf">bohm2.pdf</bibtex:nstandard>

  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2004butterfield">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>How to Add Modality to Analytical Mechanics</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2004</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>June</bibtex:month>



















    <bibtex:comment>8. Philosophy of Physics</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2004consciousness">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>Genetic Requirements for the Simulation of Consciousness</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2004</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>May</bibtex:month>



















    <bibtex:comment>9. Cognitive Science/Philosophy of Mind</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2004estlund">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>Who Is Afraid of Distributive Knowledge&#63; Estlund&#39;s Arguments against Authoritarianism</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2004</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>March</bibtex:month>



















    <bibtex:comment>9. Political Philosophy</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2004rorty">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>Ways to Reject Rorty&#39;s &#34;Unity&#34; of Sciences</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2004</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>May</bibtex:month>



















    <bibtex:comment>9. Philosophy of Science</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2004tsuda">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>Are Noise and Chaos Mechanistic&#63; Ichiro Tsuda&#39;s model of Episodic Memory and Olfactory System</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2004</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>November</bibtex:month>










    <bibtex:abstract>In this paper I take into account the interplay between chaos and noise in the model of episodic memory and olfactory system (Tsuda&#44; 2001). At a first sight models based on chaos and noise are closely related to the holistic paradigm. In this paper I endorse the opposite view: Tsuda&#8217;s model is compatible with the mechanistic paradigm because noise and chaos are associated with system components.</bibtex:abstract>








    <bibtex:comment>8. Cognitive Science/Philosophy of Mind</bibtex:comment>


    <bibtex:nstandard name="file" type="pdf" description="chaosbrain3.pdf">chaosbrain3.pdf</bibtex:nstandard>

  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2004yablo">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>Modal Fantasies of Factualism and what Are They about</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2004</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>April</bibtex:month>



















    <bibtex:comment>8. Metaphysics</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2003aqft1">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>What can be Unified by a Quantum Field Theory&#63;</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2003</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>May</bibtex:month>



















    <bibtex:comment>8. Philosophy of Physics</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2003aqft2">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>Chasing Measurement in Relativistic Quantum Field Theory</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2003</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>December</bibtex:month>



















    <bibtex:comment>9. Philosophy of Physics</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2003boundaries">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>Rise and Fall of Boundaries: The Classical Case</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2003</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>July</bibtex:month>



















    <bibtex:comment>9. Metaphysics</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2003earman">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>Matching Laws of Physics and Symmetries: Earman&#39;s Project</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2003</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>Match</bibtex:month>



















    <bibtex:comment>9. Philosophy of Science</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2003kant">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>Conceptual and Structural Aspects of Kant&#39;s &#34;Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Sciences&#34;</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2003</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>June</bibtex:month>



















    <bibtex:comment>9. History of Philosophy</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2003leibniz">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>Physics without Metaphysics&#63; Conservation and Continuity in Leibniz&#39;s Physics</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2003</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>Match</bibtex:month>



















    <bibtex:comment>9. Metaphysics</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2003mechanism">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>A Semantics and an Ontology for Mechanism and Covariation Approaches</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2003</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>May</bibtex:month>



















    <bibtex:comment>9. Cognitive Science/Philosophy of Mind</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2003newton1">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>A &#34;Field&#34; Interpretation to Newton&#39;s Philosophy of Nature</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2003</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>April</bibtex:month>



















    <bibtex:comment>9. Philosophy of Physics</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2003nn1">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>Recurrent Networks as a Model of Learning</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2003</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>April</bibtex:month>



















    <bibtex:comment>9. Cognitive Science/Philosophy of Mind</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2003nn2">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>Learning &#34;Dynamic&#34; Networks: a Case for Emergence</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2003</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>June</bibtex:month>



















    <bibtex:comment>9. Cognitive Science/Philosophy of Mind</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2003pla">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>Beyond Mechanics: Toiling for &#39;The&#39;Principle Of Physics&#39; in the Eighteenth Century</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2003</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>April</bibtex:month>



















    <bibtex:comment>9. Philosophy of Physics</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2003time">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>Time Intervals and the Structure of Time</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2003</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>April</bibtex:month>



















    <bibtex:comment>9. Metaphysics</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2002a">
  <bibtex:incollection>

    <bibtex:editor>Bodea&#44; Marcel</bibtex:editor>
    <bibtex:title>Complexitatea &#238;n timp [Complexity in Time]</bibtex:title>
    <bibtex:booktitle>Complexitatea. teme logice&#44; ontologice &#351;i epistemologice [Logic&#44; ontology and epistemology of complexity]</bibtex:booktitle>

    <bibtex:publisher>Casa Cartii de Stiinta</bibtex:publisher>
    <bibtex:year>2002</bibtex:year>










    <bibtex:address>Cluj&#45;Napoca</bibtex:address>









    <bibtex:keywords>Article&#44; time&#44; metaphysics</bibtex:keywords>
    <bibtex:comment>5. Materials in Romanian (invited or commissioned)</bibtex:comment>

    <bibtex:key>romanian:metaphysics</bibtex:key>
    <bibtex:nstandard name="file" type="pdf" description="compl3rom.pdf">compl3rom.pdf</bibtex:nstandard>

  </bibtex:incollection>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2002b">
  <bibtex:article>


    <bibtex:title>Reac&#355;ii stoice &#351;i neoplatonice la defini&#355;ia aristotelic&#259; a timpului [Stoic and Neoplatonic Reactions to Aristotle&#39;s Definition of Time]</bibtex:title>

    <bibtex:journal>ORIGINI. Caiete Silvane&#44; Revist&#259; de Studii Culturale</bibtex:journal>

    <bibtex:year>2002</bibtex:year>
    <bibtex:volume>2</bibtex:volume>



















    <bibtex:keywords>History of philosohy&#44; time</bibtex:keywords>
    <bibtex:comment>5. Materials in Romanian (invited or commissioned)</bibtex:comment>

    <bibtex:key>romanian:ancient philosophy</bibtex:key>
    <bibtex:nstandard name="file" type="" description="">origini02reactiitimparistotel</bibtex:nstandard>

  </bibtex:article>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2002structures">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>Ontologies and Mathematical Structures in Structural Realism</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2002</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>December</bibtex:month>



















    <bibtex:comment>9. Philosophy of Science</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2002truth">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>Truthlikeness and Truth</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2002</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>December</bibtex:month>



















    <bibtex:comment>9. Metaphysics</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2001c">
  <bibtex:inbook>


    <bibtex:title>Thomas Hobbes &#34;Leviathan&#34; in E. Socaciu (coordinator)&#44; Filosofia politica a lui Thomas Hobbes</bibtex:title>


    <bibtex:publisher>Polirom</bibtex:publisher>
    <bibtex:year>2001</bibtex:year>










    <bibtex:address>Iasi&#44; Romania</bibtex:address>










    <bibtex:comment>6. Translations&#44; Notes and Foreword (in Romanian)</bibtex:comment>
    <bibtex:note>Notes and translation for chapters 37&#44; 42&#44; 46&#44; 47</bibtex:note>


  </bibtex:inbook>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="2000a">
  <bibtex:unpublished>


    <bibtex:title>Time Travel and Ontology</bibtex:title>



    <bibtex:year>2000</bibtex:year>

    <bibtex:month>July</bibtex:month>










    <bibtex:abstract>This paper is a survey of the theories of time travel in a perspective close to theories of time. In the last section we discuss the special ontology of the objects that exist on closed timelike curves. We simply assert that CTC need a new ontology and these objects are not simply impossible or unconcevaible.</bibtex:abstract>
    <bibtex:url>http://philsci&#45;archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000845/00/TTdraft.pdf</bibtex:url>







    <bibtex:comment>9. Philosophy of Physics</bibtex:comment>



  </bibtex:unpublished>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="1999b">
  <bibtex:inbook>


    <bibtex:title>W. H. C. Guthrie &#34;A History of Greek Philosophy&#34;&#44; volumes 1 and 2 (1962)</bibtex:title>


    <bibtex:publisher>Teora</bibtex:publisher>
    <bibtex:year>1999</bibtex:year>










    <bibtex:address>Bucharest</bibtex:address>










    <bibtex:comment>6. Translations&#44; Notes and Foreword (in Romanian)</bibtex:comment>
    <bibtex:note>Introduction by Ioan Muntean. Translation in collaboration with Moise Mihnea</bibtex:note>


  </bibtex:inbook>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="1999c">
  <bibtex:incollection>

    <bibtex:editor>Iancu Lucica and C&#45;tin Grecu</bibtex:editor>
    <bibtex:title>Noile teorii ale timpului &#351;i diferen&#355;a ontologic&#259; [New Theories of Time and the Ontological Difference]</bibtex:title>
    <bibtex:booktitle>Logic&#259; &#351;i ontologie [Logic and ontology ]</bibtex:booktitle>

    <bibtex:publisher>Editura TREI</bibtex:publisher>
    <bibtex:year>1999</bibtex:year>




















    <bibtex:keywords>Paper&#44; time</bibtex:keywords>
    <bibtex:comment>5. Materials in Romanian (invited or commissioned)</bibtex:comment>

    <bibtex:key>romanian:metaphysics</bibtex:key>

  </bibtex:incollection>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="1999d">
  <bibtex:article>


    <bibtex:title>C.F. Weizs&#228;cker: Einige Begriffe aus Goethes Naturwissenschaft (1998)</bibtex:title>

    <bibtex:journal>Secolul XX (Bucharest)</bibtex:journal>

    <bibtex:year>1999</bibtex:year>
    <bibtex:volume>4&#45;5&#45;6</bibtex:volume>




















    <bibtex:comment>6. Translations&#44; Notes and Foreword (in Romanian)</bibtex:comment>
    <bibtex:note>Translation</bibtex:note>


  </bibtex:article>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="1998a">
  <bibtex:article>


    <bibtex:title>Posibilitatea posibilit&#259;&#355;ii. Tipuri de modalit&#259;&#355;i la Aristotel [Possibility of Possibility and Aristotelian Modalities]</bibtex:title>

    <bibtex:journal>Krisis</bibtex:journal>

    <bibtex:year>1998</bibtex:year>
    <bibtex:volume>7</bibtex:volume>


    <bibtex:pages>89-100</bibtex:pages>








    <bibtex:abstract>We try to investigate here the modal iteration of possibility in the philosophy of Aristotle. We want also to clarify the function reserved to the &#8216;possibility of possibility&#8217; in his modal scheme&#44; as well in our modern logic and philosophy. In order to emphasise the importance of second order possibility in Aristotle we expose and discuss shortly: 1) the statistical&#44; the temporal and the potential types of modality revealed by J. Hintikka&#44; S. Knuuttila&#44; etc. and 2) the degrees of possibility correlated with these models: the statistical&#44; the temporal and the probabilistic possibility. We want to suggest that admitting types and degrees of possibility (assumed now by N. Rescher and others) is a great advantage&#44; not only for the exegetical interpretation of Aristotle&#44; but also for the modern theories of possibility.</bibtex:abstract>







    <bibtex:keywords>Article&#44; Metaphysics</bibtex:keywords>
    <bibtex:comment>5. Materials in Romanian (invited or commissioned)</bibtex:comment>

    <bibtex:key>romanian:metaphysics</bibtex:key>
    <bibtex:nstandard name="file" type="" description="">krisis98posofpos</bibtex:nstandard>

  </bibtex:article>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="1998b">
  <bibtex:inbook>


    <bibtex:title>David Ross &#34;Aristotle&#34; (1923)</bibtex:title>


    <bibtex:publisher>Humanitas</bibtex:publisher>
    <bibtex:year>1998</bibtex:year>










    <bibtex:address>Bucharest</bibtex:address>


    <bibtex:url>http://humanitas.ro/carti/carte.php&#63;id=1075</bibtex:url>







    <bibtex:comment>6. Translations&#44; Notes and Foreword (in Romanian)</bibtex:comment>
    <bibtex:note>Translation in collaboration with Rus Richard</bibtex:note>


  </bibtex:inbook>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="1998e">
  <bibtex:article>


    <bibtex:title>Interview with Alvin Plantinga</bibtex:title>

    <bibtex:journal>Krisis</bibtex:journal>

    <bibtex:year>1998</bibtex:year>
    <bibtex:volume>7</bibtex:volume>


    <bibtex:pages>173-181</bibtex:pages>







    <bibtex:howpublished>Krisis 7</bibtex:howpublished>









    <bibtex:comment>6. Translations&#44; Notes and Foreword (in Romanian)</bibtex:comment>
    <bibtex:note>Editing and translating</bibtex:note>


  </bibtex:article>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="1999a">
  <bibtex:inbook>


    <bibtex:title>P. Aubenque &#34;Le Probl&#232;me de l&#39;Etre chez Aristote: Essai sur la Probl&#233;matique Aristot&#233;licienne&#34;(1963)</bibtex:title>


    <bibtex:publisher>Teora</bibtex:publisher>
    <bibtex:year>1998</bibtex:year>










    <bibtex:address>Bucharest</bibtex:address>










    <bibtex:comment>6. Translations&#44; Notes and Foreword (in Romanian)</bibtex:comment>
    <bibtex:note>Foreword and revision of the translation by D. Gheorghe</bibtex:note>


  </bibtex:inbook>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="1997a">
  <bibtex:article>


    <bibtex:title>Dumnezeu &#351;i lumea &#8211; procese complementare&#63; Aspecte ale onto&#45;teologiei lui A. N. Whitehead [God and World as Complementary Processes. Issues in the Onto&#45;theology of A. N. Whitehead]</bibtex:title>

    <bibtex:journal>Krisis</bibtex:journal>

    <bibtex:year>1997</bibtex:year>
    <bibtex:volume>5</bibtex:volume>


    <bibtex:pages>36-42</bibtex:pages>
    <bibtex:number>5</bibtex:number>







    <bibtex:abstract>Here we try to show that the last part of A.N. Whitehead&#8217;s Process and Reality (the &#8217;Final Interpretation&#8217;) should be conceived as a standing alternative to the rule applied in the Western scientific thought. As we know&#44; this rule asserts that &#171;all scientific presuppositions must be free of any theological or metaphysical implications&#187;. By the refutation of this principle&#44; Whitehead heeded that God and World had to be onceived as two complementary processes. If we accept this&#10;interpretation&#44; science and theology can straighten out from the multiple antinomies that they must to confront with. The new encounter between theology and formal ontology (named here ontotheology) is a major result of Whitehead&#8217;s philosophy&#44; inasmuch as it resolves the antinomies that each of them could not work out alone.</bibtex:abstract>







    <bibtex:keywords>Article&#44; metaphysics</bibtex:keywords>
    <bibtex:comment>5. Materials in Romanian (invited or commissioned)</bibtex:comment>

    <bibtex:key>romanian:metaphysics</bibtex:key>
    <bibtex:nstandard name="file" type="pdf" description="">krisis97dumnezeu&#95;si&#95;lumea.pdf</bibtex:nstandard>

  </bibtex:article>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="1997b">
  <bibtex:inbook>


    <bibtex:title>Zygmunt Bauman&#44; &#34;Freedom&#34; (1988)</bibtex:title>


    <bibtex:publisher>Du Style</bibtex:publisher>
    <bibtex:year>1997</bibtex:year>










    <bibtex:address>Bucharest</bibtex:address>










    <bibtex:comment>6. Translations&#44; Notes and Foreword (in Romanian)</bibtex:comment>
    <bibtex:note>Introduction and translation</bibtex:note>


  </bibtex:inbook>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="1997c">
  <bibtex:article>


    <bibtex:title>Robert Stalnaker &#34;Possible Worlds&#34; (1976)</bibtex:title>

    <bibtex:journal>Krisis</bibtex:journal>

    <bibtex:year>1997</bibtex:year>
    <bibtex:volume>5</bibtex:volume>


    <bibtex:pages>84-91</bibtex:pages>

















    <bibtex:comment>6. Translations&#44; Notes and Foreword (in Romanian)</bibtex:comment>
    <bibtex:note>Translation</bibtex:note>


  </bibtex:article>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="1996a">
  <bibtex:article>


    <bibtex:title>Fenomenologia polis&#45;ului [Phenomenology of Polis]</bibtex:title>

    <bibtex:journal>Krisis</bibtex:journal>

    <bibtex:year>1996</bibtex:year>
    <bibtex:volume>3</bibtex:volume>


    <bibtex:pages>50-61</bibtex:pages>
    <bibtex:number>3</bibtex:number>







    <bibtex:abstract>On applique ici la m&#233;thode ph&#233;nom&#233;nologique au polis qui est le &#8222;contexte&#8220; de la manifestation d&#39;un modus vivendi. L&#8217;image du polis comme lieu de la mensonge et la conception oppos&#233;e qui lui montre comme lieu privil&#233;gi&#233;e d&#39;intersection entre plusieurs modes d&#39;interpr&#233;ter la v&#233;rit&#233; sont compatibles parce que&#44; selon Heidegger&#44; la ambigu&#239;t&#233; de l&#39;homme se manifeste dans le polis qui est le poros &#8212; le point d&#39;intersection de toutes les voies possibles.</bibtex:abstract>







    <bibtex:keywords>Article&#44; phenomenology</bibtex:keywords>
    <bibtex:comment>5. Materials in Romanian (invited or commissioned)</bibtex:comment>

    <bibtex:key>romanian:phenomenology</bibtex:key>
    <bibtex:nstandard name="file" type="pdf" description="">krsisi96fenomenologia&#95;polis.pdf</bibtex:nstandard>

  </bibtex:article>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="1996b">
  <bibtex:article>


    <bibtex:title>Timpul ca parcurs hermeneutic [Time as a Hermeneutical Pathway]</bibtex:title>

    <bibtex:journal>Krisis</bibtex:journal>

    <bibtex:year>1996</bibtex:year>
    <bibtex:volume>4</bibtex:volume>


    <bibtex:pages>81-86</bibtex:pages>
    <bibtex:number>4</bibtex:number>







    <bibtex:abstract>On &#224; voulu exposer&#44; tout d&#8217;abord&#44; les traits fondamentaux de l&#39;inter&#45;pr&#233;tation du texte&#44; c&#8217;est&#45;&#224;&#45;dire d&#8217;une technique du langage qui remon&#45;te &#224; l&#8217;Antiquit&#233; et au Moyen Age. &#192; l&#39;&#233;gard d&#8217;une &#8222;nouvelle&#8220; m&#233;thode d&#39;interpr&#233;tation (ex&#233;g&#233;tique)&#10;m&#233;&#45;di&#233;vale&#44; il s&#8217;agit pr&#233;cis&#233;ment de la concorde joachimite&#44; on a fait un excursus&#44; en montrant les traits g&#233;n&#233;raux d&#8217;une ex&#233;g&#232;se typologique et&#44; notamment&#44; de son processus &#171;spirituel&#187; d&#233;velopp&#233; dans l&#8217;histoire mondaine&#44; qui fonde la th&#233;orie d&#8217;une &#8222;eschatologie radicale&#8220;&#44; en bouleversant l&#8217;esp&#233;rance chr&#233;tienne dans la &#8222;pl&#233;nitude&#8220; transcendante. &#192; la fin&#44; on a rappel&#233; la critique de Thomas d&#8217;Aquin &#224; l&#39;&#233;gard de l&#8217;ex&#233;g&#232;se et de l&#8217;histoire du salut joachimites&#44; c&#8217;est&#45;&#224;&#45;dire la&#10;r&#233;action de l&#39;autorit&#233; scolastique vers une interpr&#233;tation fort originelle&#44; mais&#44; &#224; la fois&#44; pleine de mirages &#8222;dangereux&#8220;.</bibtex:abstract>







    <bibtex:keywords>Article&#44; hermeneutics</bibtex:keywords>
    <bibtex:comment>5. Materials in Romanian (invited or commissioned)</bibtex:comment>

    <bibtex:key>romanian:phenomenology</bibtex:key>
    <bibtex:nstandard name="file" type="pdf" description="">krisis96timphermenetutic.pdf</bibtex:nstandard>

  </bibtex:article>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="1995a">
  <bibtex:article>


    <bibtex:title>Prezen&#355;&#259; &#351;i interioritate [Presence and Innerness]</bibtex:title>

    <bibtex:journal>Krisis</bibtex:journal>

    <bibtex:year>1995</bibtex:year>
    <bibtex:volume>1</bibtex:volume>


    <bibtex:pages>12-23</bibtex:pages>
    <bibtex:number>1</bibtex:number>















    <bibtex:keywords>Article&#44; phenomenology</bibtex:keywords>
    <bibtex:comment>5. Materials in Romanian (invited or commissioned)</bibtex:comment>

    <bibtex:key>romanian:phenomenology</bibtex:key>
    <bibtex:nstandard name="file" type="pdf" description="">krisis95presenta&#95;interioritate.pdf</bibtex:nstandard>

  </bibtex:article>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="1995b">
  <bibtex:article>


    <bibtex:title>Identitate &#351;i identificare &#238;n Eneade [Identity and Identification in Plotinus&#39; Enneads]</bibtex:title>

    <bibtex:journal>Krisis</bibtex:journal>

    <bibtex:year>1995</bibtex:year>
    <bibtex:volume>2</bibtex:volume>


    <bibtex:pages>21-38</bibtex:pages>
    <bibtex:number>1</bibtex:number>







    <bibtex:abstract>La s&#233;lection des fragments d&#8217;Enneades traduits ci&#45;dessous en roumain a eu pour crit&#232;re les th&#232;mes de l&#8217;identit&#233;&#44; en tant que &#8222;cat&#233;gorie&#8220; de la mati&#232;re et du &#8222;Nous&#8220;&#44; de l&#39;identification sujet/objet de la connaissance et de l&#39;identification &#8222;&#226;me de l&#8217;univers&#8220;/&#8222;&#226;me individuelle&#8220;. Dans la premi&#232;re partie on prend en consid&#233;ration les degr&#233;s de l&#39;identit&#233; et de l&#8217;alt&#233;rit&#233; chez Plotin en y remarquant une d&#233;gradation progressive de l&#8217;identit&#233;: ainsi&#44; la propri&#233;t&#233; de la mati&#232;re &#8222;de ne pas sortir d&#8217;elle m&#234;me&#8220; (o&#217;k oekstasij) est&#45;elle le degr&#233; inf&#233;rieur de l&#8217;identit&#233;; m&#234;me si l&#8217;&#226;me poss&#232;de plus d&#8217;identit&#233; que la mati&#232;re&#44; seulement dans le &#8222;Nous&#8220; se trouve une identit&#233; absolue. Une deuxi&#232;me partie est r&#233;serv&#233;e &#224; l&#8217;analyse des hypoth&#232;ses de F. Heinemann&#44; G. Nebel&#44; K.&#45;H. Volkmann Schluck et O. Langer; de m&#234;me&#44; on discute ici l&#39;interpr&#233;tation avanc&#233;e par K. Jaspers selon laquelle les cat&#233;gories repr&#233;sentent des principes dont l&#8217;&#226;me a besoin afin de conna&#238;tre le &#8222;Nous&#8220; et la nature. Dans la troisi&#232;me partie on montre qu&#8217;il y a des similitudes entre l&#8217;identification sujet&#45;connaissant/objet&#45;connu dans les Enneades d&#39;une part et d&#39;autre part dans le syst&#232;me de l&#39;id&#233;alisme transcendantal. Finalement&#44; on discute la position de Plotin en ce qui concerne l&#8217;identification &#8222;&#226;me de l&#8217;univers&#8220;/&#8222;&#226;me individuelle&#8220;&#44; en faisant remarquer les difficult&#233;s de sa psychologie &#8222;h&#233;nophanique&#8220;. Le pr&#233;sent &#233;tude s&#39;&#233;vertue &#224; ponctuer l&#8217;importance exceptionnelle de la philosophie de Plotin pour l&#8217;&#233;dification d&#8217;une possible philosophie de l&#39;identit&#233; et de l&#8217;identification.</bibtex:abstract>







    <bibtex:keywords>Translation&#44; commentary&#44; History of Philosophy</bibtex:keywords>
    <bibtex:comment>5. Materials in Romanian (invited or commissioned)</bibtex:comment>
    <bibtex:note>Notes and commentaries. Translation in collaboration with L. Zaschievici and I. Pintea</bibtex:note>
    <bibtex:key>romanian:ancient philosophy</bibtex:key>
    <bibtex:nstandard name="file" type="pdf" description="">krisis96plotinidentitateidentificare.pdf</bibtex:nstandard>

  </bibtex:article>
</bibtex:entry>
<bibtex:entry id="1995d">
  <bibtex:article>


    <bibtex:title>Alfred North Whitehead: Abstraction (1926)</bibtex:title>

    <bibtex:journal>Krisis</bibtex:journal>

    <bibtex:year>1995</bibtex:year>
    <bibtex:volume>1</bibtex:volume>


    <bibtex:pages>60-67</bibtex:pages>

















    <bibtex:comment>6. Translations&#44; Notes and Foreword (in Romanian)</bibtex:comment>
    <bibtex:note>Translation and notes in collaboration with Matei Stroila</bibtex:note>


  </bibtex:article>
</bibtex:entry>
</bibtex:file>
